Template

The Senior School Student Technology Agreement

A full technology agreement for senior students: digital citizenship as self-regulation, AI and academic integrity done properly, and a clear line from "AI not permitted" to "AI expected and assessed".

First page of the Senior School Student Technology Agreement

About this template

More independence, more responsibility.

The senior version frames digital citizenship as self-regulation rather than compliance, and it does the hard part properly: AI and academic integrity, with a red / amber / green model that separates "AI not permitted" from "AI expected and assessed". It points to your AI policy and data policy rather than repeating them, so it stays current when those documents change, and it ends with a student declaration the young person actually signs in their own name.

What you get

The whole agreement, in one document.

  • Fourteen sections: digital-citizenship commitments (including AI literacy), access, devices, internet, email, social media, AI, data protection, academic integrity, wellbeing, monitoring, consequences, and support.
  • A red / amber / green AI model built for assessment, not just permission: from "AI not permitted" to "AI expected and assessed".
  • Written to sit alongside your AI policy and data policy, so it stays current when those documents change rather than duplicating them.
  • A student declaration and family co-sign, plus an editable Word version so you can adapt the wording.

Get the template

Where should I send your copy?

The document opens straight away, and a copy of the link goes to your inbox so you can come back to it. You'll also get the Littlejohns Letter, a short email on AI in schools you can use the same week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Who's behind this

Littlejohns is an educator-led partnership for AI in schools: long-term, alongside-the-school implementation, led by a practising Director of Technology who runs this work inside a real school every week. A student agreement only matters once it sits inside a wider approach to AI and academic integrity, and that is worth a conversation.

Book a call